Legal Opinion

City of New Albany v. Conger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1897No. 2,127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Wiley, C. J. —

Appellee sued appellant upon a contract for performing certain public work under and by virtue of an ordinance passed and adopted by the appellant’s common council. The substantial and material provisions of the contract are as follows: That appellee agreed to grade, curb, pave, gutter, pave centers and macadamize, pave sidewalks and masonry of a certain street in said city. Said contract contained the following provisions: “Said city promises and agrees to pay said Conger for doing said work and improvement the several sums as mentioned in his written proposal, which is marked…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. FullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Johnson v. Common Council of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wren v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. City of Greencastle v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. City of New Albany v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anthony v. MastersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API