Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 16, 2004No. 07-03-0318-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Appellant Rodney B. Adams appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Via two issues, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress without a hearing. Doing so purportedly constituted 1) an abuse of discretion under article 28.01(6) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and 2) a violation of his due process rights. We affirm the judgment.

It is settled that

“as a prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that ... the complaint was made to the trial court by a timely request,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Nirschl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sepeda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  2. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Busbey, John Richard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  5. David Bryan Winters v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API