Legal Opinion

Pirant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 2001No. 2D00-2127Published

1Opinion of the Court

SALCINES, Judge.

Robert Pirant appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell and possession of cannabis. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. Therefore, we do not decide the merit of these issues. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pendarvis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000