Walsh v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Lord, J.:
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, Walsh, to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. In the answer, negligence is denied by the defendant, and negligence of the plaintiff, which contributed to the injury, is averred. The evidence submitted by the defendant tended, substantially, to establish the following facts: That at the time of the injury, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant in the capacity of brakeman on one of its railroad trains running between Walla Walla and Wallula; that a short time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Gaynor v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Oldfield v. . the N.Y. and Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. RutherfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnston v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Massey v. SellerOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Grant v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.