Legal Opinion

United States v. Flowers

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 10, 1963No. Cr. 9575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Chief Judge.

The two defendants herein were proceeded against as juvenile delinquents under the Juvenile Delinquency Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 5031, on their pleas of guilty to an information charging a violation of the Dyer Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The defendants were represented by court-appointed counsel. They consented to procedure under the Juvenile Delinquency Act with the consent of the District Attorney.

On September 20, 1963, sentences of three years for each defendant were imposed by this court. The defendants were committed to the custody of the Attorney General for such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Jural Borders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. BordersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1957
  4. United States v. FottoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. William Virgil Fagerstrom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FountaineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Fish v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
  3. United States v. Steven Earl ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. HallDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
  5. United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API