Legal Opinion

Rosario v. Bann Housing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Tar-gum, J.), entered on or about May 12, 1994, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to amend its answer to set forth counterclaims against plaintiffs’ parents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the absence of evidence that the parents had a duty with respect to the painting of their rented apartment (see, Multiple Dwelling Law § 78; Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-2013 [h]) or otherwise affirmatively created the condition giving rise to the injury (see, Barocas v Woolworth Co., 207 AD2d 145, 149), the allegations of the proposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Alharb v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Barocas v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bracero v. 2780 Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API