Legal Opinion
City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Pigott, J.
At issue in this case is the meaning of the words “in effect” as contained in Laws of 2009, chapter 504 (part A, § 8), specifi*655cally whether expired collective bargaining agreements are “in effect” for purposes of that statute because of the so-called Triborough Law.
Petitioner, the City of Yonkers, and respondent, Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, IAFF, AFL-CIO, entered into a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), dated July 1, 2002, which, by stipulation, was extended to June 30, 2009. In the CBA, the City agreed to offer its firefighters the option of enrolling…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between City of Johnstown & Johnstown Police Benevolent Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Professional Staff Congress-City University v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re the Claims of GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration Between City of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Evans v. Deposit Cent. Sch. Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Buffalo Niagara Airport Firefighters Ass'n v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Buffalo Niagara Airport Firefighters Ass'n v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Arbitration Between City of OswegoNew York Court of Appeals · 2013