Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 1969No. 42214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

The conviction is for assault with intent to rob; the punishment, six years.

The record does not contain a transcription of the court reporter’s notes for the guilt or penalty stages of the trial.

In the sole ground of error, complaint is made that some members of the jury had previously read a newspaper article and mentioned it at the penalty stage of the trial. The article contained a statement that a co-defendant of appellant had been convicted and was assessed a penalty of six years. When the jury brought in the verdict of the penalty, appellant asked to poll the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Perbetsky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Kizzee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Dennehy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. McMillon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Jose Angel Renteria-Garcia v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  4. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API