Legal Opinion

Hill v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1930No. Docket No. 4019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action in claim and delivery for the recovery of certain personal property. Plain tiff had judgment for the return of the property, or for the value thereof, in case a return could not be made. From this judgment defendants appeal on the judgment-roll alone.

But one point is presented on the appeal. Appellants contend that the" judgment is too uncertain to be enforced, or enforceable, and that there is no description of the property sufficient to enable an officer executing the judgment to identify the property.

As indicated, we have before us the judgment-roll…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cooke v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hawley v. KocherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lamus v. EngwichtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Welch v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kohn v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API