Legal Opinion
Kaczor v. Vanchem, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by Robert G. Kaczor (plaintiff) when he was exposed to phosgene and isopropyl chloroformate fumes released from a chemical facility operated by defendant Vanchem, Inc. (Vanchem). Defendant Van DeMark Chemical Co., Inc. (Van DeMark) is a sister company in the same corporate group as Vanchem and operates another chemical facility nearby.
Supreme Court erred in denying that part of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Miller v. National Cabinet Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Perez v. Paramount Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Stanski v. EzerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Feszczyszyn v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Perez v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Norberg v. Pepsi Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Kurz v. St. Francis HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Gilg v. ManzellaNew York Supreme Court, Niagara County · 2026
- Ratner v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010