Legal Opinion
La Plante v. Office of the Director of Regulation
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided July 8, 2004No. GDTC-AA-03-118-FOEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
EAGAN, Judge.
The plaintiff brought the present action alleging that the suspension of his gaming license and barring from the Mohegan Sun Casino was improper. The suspension was the result of an allegation that the plaintiff had stolen casino funds and placed them in his toke box for tips.
A notice dated February 19, 2003, was sent to the plaintiff suspending his gaming-license and barring the plaintiff from the Casino property.
The plaintiff filed a timely request for hearing. The hearing was held on April 23, 2003, at which time the plaintiff was present and represented himself pro…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. BrosnanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- La Plante v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
- James v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009