Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. 10-84-06996 & 10-84-07682; CA A34677 & A34678Published

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted for burglary in the first degree, theft in the first degree and possession of a controlled substance. He appeals only the conviction for burglary. The charge and conviction was for first degree burglary based on the use a burglary tool: a power drill. ORS 164.225(1)(a). The state concedes that the power drill was not proven to be a burglary tool. State v. Graves, 299 Or 189, 700 P2d 244 (1985); State v. Sells, 299 Or 198, 702 P2d 68 (1985). We agree.

Because the court found that defendant committed a burglary, we vacate the judgment on the burglary in the first degree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SellsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API