Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hill v. Phillips, Barratt, Kaiser Engineering Ltd.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 26, 1984No. Civ. 84-0077-BPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CYR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff requests remand of this diversity action on the ground that the Verified Petition for Removal [petition] submitted by Defendant Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd. [Babcock] on February 17, 1984, was not timely filed. According to the petition Babcock received the state court complaint on January 31, 1984. However, codefendant Zurn Industries, Inc. [Zurn] was served on January 12, 1984 through its agent. Although the petition stated that codefendant Phillips, Barratt, Kaiser Engineering Ltd. [Phillips] had “only recently received its Summons and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Albonetti v. GAF Corporation-Chemical GroupDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Kaneshiro v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
  4. Perrin v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1974
  5. Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  2. Garside Ex Rel. Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  3. Cohen v. HoardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1988
  4. Martin Pet Products (U.S.), Inc. v. LawrenceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. Sansone v. Morton MacHine Works, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API