Legal Opinion

State v. Hays

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Rockwall. Tried below before the Hon. M. H. Bonner.

1Opinion of the Court

Devine, Associate Justice.

The question presented for consideration is the sufficiency of the indictment, which was set aside on defendant’s motion, the grounds of the motion being that the indictment failed to charge the assault as being unlawful, and that it did not charge that the assault was made with the intent to injure the person upon whom it was committed.

Every assault charged in an indictment is an unlawful assault, and the intent to injure will be inferred from the illegal act charged. The act imports illegality on its face; and if there were circumstances that would show it to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Martin v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McNamara v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. People v. CantwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bronson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
  4. Browning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877
  5. Forrest v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API