Legal Opinion

United States v. David Chorin A/K/A Charlie David Chorin, United States of America v. Kevin Robert Caden A/K/A Thomas Kimble Kevin Robert Caden

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 11, 2003No. 01-3544, 01-3574PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Kevin Caden and David Chorin appeal the judgments of sentence imposed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on September 13, 2001. The District Court imposed consecutive sentences on defendants’ convictions of possession of a precursor and attempt to manufacture a controlled substance. Both defendants argue that the imposition of consecutive sentences, which resulted in an aggregate sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum for either individual count, violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Vincent Wilkerson v. Superintendent Fayette SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Rooney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. United States v. Paul PavulakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API