Legal Opinion

Poulin

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 20, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In these discharge proceedings under G. L. c. 123A, § 9, as amended through St. 1966, c. 608,1 there was a considerable split of professional authority. Two psychiatrists and the assistant administrator of the center for the treatment of the sexually dangerous at M.C.I., Bridgewater (center),2 opined that Ronald J. Poulin was a sexually dangerous person (SDP). Two psychiatrists and a psychologist gave their opinions that he was not an SDP. The Superior Court judge who conducted the § 9 hearing found that Poulin’s misconduct in sexual matters indicates a general lack of power to control his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Page v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. LeavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Ronald BoyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. RedgateMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. JohnstoneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  4. LaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API