Legal Opinion

Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeál from that part of *881the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Lopez v. Fordham UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Henriquez v. New 520 Gsh LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011