Legal Opinion
Saturn Systems, Inc. v. Saturn Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1987No. 4-87 Civ 249Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant Saturn Corporation’s motion for attorney’s fees and sanctions based on Section 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a); Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. At the hearing upon defendant’s motion to dismiss this action for improper venue held March 27, 1987, the court invited plaintiff’s counsel to submit a brief in response to this motion. Counsel has done this.
On December 11, 1986, counsel for plaintiff, Saturn Systems, Inc., filed a complaint alleging defendant has violated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Foxtrap, Inc. T/a Foxtrappe v. Foxtrap, Inc. T/a FoxtrappeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.