Legal Opinion

City of Opelika v. Opelika Sewer Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 26, 1924No. 524PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit by the Opelika Sewer Company to enjoin the City against preventing the plaintiff by various means at its disposal from putting into effect a schedule of rates that the plaintiff has proposed. It is to be taken that the present rates, which the plaintiff seeks to increase, are confiscatory unless the City has a right to insist upon them; and the question before us is whether the City has that right by contract or whether its enforcement of them deprives the plaintiff of its property without due process of law contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. City of Greenville v. Greenville Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Mobile Electric Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Weller v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. City of Bessemer v. Bessemer City Water WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Burr v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Southern Utilities Co. v. City of PalatkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Phenix City v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Fink v. City of ClarendonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API