Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 1979No. A7704 05325, CA 10789PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a law action for damages for the alleged 'each of a bailment contract. The defendant has ppealed from the judgment entered on the jury’s jrdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $65,000. We ¡verse and remand.1

The plaintiff was an experienced dealer in used wmill equipment. In 1972 he purchased a large >lume of that type of equipment in the western states r reshipment to the Philippine Islands. The defend-lt has a yard in connection with its office and shops l Columbia Boulevard in Portland. The yard is ap-oximately 20 acres in size and is enclosed by a six-ot-high cyclone wire fence.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Harley-Davidson Motorsports, Inc. v. MarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API