Legal Opinion

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Central Electric Ry.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1898No. Sac. No. 389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Sacramento County. Action by the Thomson-Houston Electric Company against the Central Electric Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to recover the sum of $1,100, the contract price of four so-called Tripp trucks, furnished by plaintiff to defendant under written contract executed March 19, 1892. The cause was tried by a jury, and defendant had the verdict and judgment thereon. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying motion for new trial. The pleadings are verified.

Plaintiff is a Connecticut corporation, transacting business in San Francisco and other places through branch agencies. The manager of the San Francisco branch was Thomas Ad*203dison, with authority to make the contract.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dolman Co., Inc. v. Rubber CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Winter v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Hicks v. FrazerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
  4. Martin Bros. Inc. v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API