Legal Opinion
Management & Training Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2013No. 12-561CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BID PROTEST
Pre-Award Bid Protest; Small Business Set Aside; Contract to Operate Dayton Job Corps Center; Workforce Investment Act of 1998; Selection of Operators “On a Competitive Basis”; 29 U.S.C. § 2887(a); “Rule of Two”; FAR 19.502-2(b).
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge
Plaintiff, Management & Training Corporation (“MTC”), filed this bid protest action (docket entry 1) on September 4, 2012, along with a request for a preliminary injunction (docket entry 2). Plaintiff challenges the decision of the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) to set aside for small businesses the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Management & Training Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- United States ex rel. Garzione v. Pae Government Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Analytical Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Homeland Security Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.