Legal Opinion
Marquis v. Eisenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*742In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated March 10, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Questions of fact exist…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dragunova v. DonderoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Garner v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sokolovsky v. Mucip, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hernandez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Carswell v. BandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011