Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armstrong v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 31, 2001No. 1388993Published

1DissentBenton, Judge

Applying Code § 18.2-308.2, a panel of this Court in Jones v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 354, 429 S.E.2d 615 (1993), noted that “[t]he legislature has assigned various meanings to the term ‘firearm’ in [different] sections of Title 18.2,” id. at 356, 429 S.E.2d at 615-16, and concluded that “whether the term ‘firearm’ when used in a statute without being defined is to be given its traditional meaning or a more expansive meaning depends upon the purpose and policy underlying the particular statute.” Id. at 357, 429 S.E.2d at 616. Based upon a review of the various statutes, the decision further…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Services of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. Burns v. Board of Sup'rs of Stafford CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API