Legal Opinion

Estate of Wesolowski v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 1998No. Nos. 1 CA-IC 97-0006, 1 CA-IC 97-0009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 When Adolph J. Wesolowski died, Robert G. Clem, an existing household employee, was retained in employment by Wesolowski’s estate to maintain the residence .and put it in condition to be sold. During the time Clem performed household maintenance for Wesolowski, Wesolowski was not obliged to provide him workers’ compensation coverage; employers of “domestic servants” are exempt from the obligation faced by most employers to provide workers’ compensation coverage for their employees. See Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-902(A) (1995 & Supp.1997). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Professional Furniture Service v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Spear v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roughton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Kwietkauski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API