Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Axelrod

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1935No. Appeal, 287PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit. On full consideration of the pleadings we have concluded that the judgment must be reversed— not because of the sufficiency of the affidavit of defense, but because the plaintiff’s statement is not self-sustaining on the face of the record, and on that account she is not, in the present state of the pleadings, in a position to demand judgment: Chestnut Street Nat. Bank v. Ellis, 161 Pa. 241, 244, 28 A. 1082; Penn Nat. Bank v. Kopitzsch Soap Co., 161 Pa.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Fritz v. HathawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Chestnut Street National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Taggart v. De FillippoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Dauphin County v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Somers v. Hildenbrand, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API