Legal Opinion

In Re Herzig

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 16, 1994No. 19-40117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the court for determination of Debtor’s request for approval of his Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan. Shawmut Bank, N.A. and Signal Capital Corporation (the “Creditors”) have filed objections.

The parties agree that the adequacy of the Statement and confirmability of the plan depend upon the treatment which I accord to Debtor’s rights under a testamentary trust as set forth below.

Agreed Facts

1. James M. Herzig (“Debtor”) filed this Chapter 11 petition on April 16, 1993.

2. Debtor is married to Margaret Herzig (“Margaret”),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re Alan David Lichstrahl, Debtor. Alan David Lichstrahl v. Bankers TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. In Re KincaidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re SPM Manufacturing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  5. In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butler v. Candlewood Road Partners, LLC (In re Raymond)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  2. In Re OrkinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  3. In Re KelloggUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  4. In Re TaftUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  5. Braunstein v. Beatrice (In Re Beatrice)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API