Legal Opinion

JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW v. Shull

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 2, 2007No. Record 071014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice BARBARAMILANO KEENAN.

The Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (the Commission) filed the present complaint against James Michael Shull, Judge of the Thirtieth Judicial District, pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court set forth in Article VI, § 10 of the Constitution of Virginia and Code § 17.1-902. The Commission alleged that its charges against Judge Shull for allegedly violating the Canons of Judicial Conduct (the Canons) are well founded in fact, and that the violations are of sufficient gravity to require that this Court censure or remove him from office.

I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Shelton & Luck v. SydnorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Board of Supervisors v. BOARD OF ZONINGSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Humphreys v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  5. America Online, Inc. v. Anonymous Publicly Traded Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. JUD. INQUIRY & REVIEW COM'N OF VA v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. In re Multi-Circuit Episcopal Church Property LitigationFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008
  3. Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. In Re: Aprobación De Enmiendas Al Reglamento Del Tribunal De ApelacionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API