Legal Opinion

Burns Motor Co. v. Briggs

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

The parties stand in this court in an order the reverse of that held in the court below, but will be referred to in this opinion as they were in that court.

The original action in the trial court was one in replevin, filed by Theodore Briggs, the owner of a Ford coupe automobile. The defendant, Burns Motor Company, in its answer alleged that the property was held and detained by it pursuant to a warehouse or storage lien, and by way of cross-petition sought recovery of the warehouse and towing charges in the sum of $20.

The plaintiff was a temporary resident of the city of Akron, and he kept…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. GraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  2. Whitlock Machine Co. v. HolwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Younger v. PlunkettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Doughman v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Candler v. AshOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Wilkinson v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API