Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 2009No. 3D08-245PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Confession of Error

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(Z). The record shows that, after retained counsel was permitted to withdraw, the defendant was not represented by counsel, as he was entitled at that critical stage. See Searcy v. State, 971 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), review denied, 988 So.2d 622 (Fla.2008). Because, in addition, and as the state agrees, it does not appear that inquiry was actually made as to his entitlement to court-appointed counsel, as he requested and as the court…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Searcy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API