Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Rhodia Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 2012No. Nos. 2011 CA 0434, 2011 CA 0435, 2011 CA 0436, 2011 CA 0437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGuidry, J.

|sRhodia Inc. (Rhodia), The Elliott Company (Elliott),1 and Entergy Corporation (Entergy) appeal a class certification judgment in these consolidated suits arising from a chemical release at Rhodia’s Baton Rouge plant. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 22, 1999, the Rhodia plant in Baton Rouge lost electrical power due to a problem at an Entergy facility and released a small amount of sulphur trioxide from a stack. The release began at approximately 2:30 a.m. and lasted approximately forty minutes.

The East Baton…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Boyd v. Allied Signal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Singleton v. Northfield Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph Allen, Steven Ayres, Ashley Hurlburt, Rory Kevin Gates, James Howard, Demarcus Morrow, Rodney Waller, Keith Arcement, Frederick Bell, Genaro Cruz Gomez, Sam Ybarra, Michael Carter and James Park on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situ v. John Bel Edwards, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Louisiana, Zita Jackson Andrus, Chris L. Bowman, Flozell Daniels, Jr., Thomas D. Davenport, Jr., Patrick J. Fanning, W. Ross Foote, Katherine E. Gilmer, Michael C. Ginart, Jr., Frank HLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API