Legal Opinion
Darling v. Hoban
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
Plaintiff brought suit to recover the value of a building erected by him under the provisions of a lease made May 1,1877, with defendant, for the term of five years next ensuing, at a yearly rent of $4100. Said lease contained the following clause, viz.:
“ Said second party [meaning the plaintiff] is hereby permitted and agrees to erect a building to reasonably occupy the space between the buildings now on said property and the new Wayne County Savings Bank, to cost not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5000), and to be of equal height with the building now on said corner. Said first party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Delashman v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Renoud v. DaskamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Beller v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Brand v. FrumvellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by16 opinions
- Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Kaybill Corp., Inc. v. CherneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. HirschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Abell v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- I. X. L. Furniture & Carpet Installment House v. BeretsUtah Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.