Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Paolino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanaugh, J.

¶ 1 Richard Paolino appeals from his judgment of sentence of 30 to 120 years of imprisonment and a fine of $375,000.00 imposed on him following conviction of insurance fraud, conspiracy to practice osteopathic medicine without a license, practicing osteopathic medicine without a license, delivery of Vieodin, delivery of Xanax, delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance, prescribing controlled substances contrary to the requirements of law and conspiracy to prescribe controlled substances contrary to the requirements of law.

¶ 2 The conviction followed a two-week jury trial; followed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. DardenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. MontalvoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManuelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. Wilkins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2007
  3. Com. v. Paolino, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Romer v. MHM Health Professionals, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API