Legal Opinion

The J. P. Schuh

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided January 30, 1915No. 1469PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Anderson Jackson and others against the steamer J. P. Schuh.

1Opinion of the Court

TOULMIN, District Judge.

The material facts in this case are few and- simple, and without serious conflict. There is a conflict in the evidence as to some minor questions involved in the case.

The evidence on the part of the libelants was in substance that they *456were hired by Mr. Spottswood to go up the river with the steamer J. P. Schuh, and barges in tow, four in number, to get cross-ties. They were to load the barges with cross-ties, and return with the steamer and the barges, loaded with the cross-ties, to Mobile; the barges thus loaded being in tow of the steamer. It did not appear from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disbrow v. The Walsh Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1888
  2. The SentinelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1907
  3. Leonard v. The Belle of the CoastDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1893
  4. Russell v. The TwilightDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. The GalinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Casper Nationak Bank v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gonzales v. United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924
  4. Soderstrom v. Curry & Whyte, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API