Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Gross

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Civil No. 2103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

— Anabel Gross, the appellee, sued Perkins and Franklin, appellants, to recover damages which she claims to have suffered on account of false representations made to her concerning a house which she purchased from them. The house was said to be a new stucco-covered brick house. It is conceded that it was not brick, and that part of the material which went into its construction had already served its purpose in a different structure. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the appellee, upon which judgment was rendered.

One of the errors complained of is that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Judd v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Pope v. FloreaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sult v. BolenbachArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Smith v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API