Legal Opinion

In Re Matter of on George

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 2019No. COA18-611Published

1ConcurrenceDillon, Judge

The facts of this case produce a harsh result. The Georges have lost much wealth due to the low purchase price paid at the foreclosure sale of their property. However, we are compelled to follow the law. And the law does not require that the party who purchased their property at the foreclosure sale to have paid a "valuable consideration," as that term is understood in cases cited by the dissent, to be entitled to protection.

Our General Assembly protects the title of anyone who purchases property at a judicial sale so long as the purchaser is "a purchaser in good faith[.]" N.C. Gen. Stat. §…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Worthy v. . CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. King v. . McRackanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API