Gitlitz v. Plankinton Building Properties, Inc.

The plaintiff had been occupying the premises described in the preceding statement of facts as a dress shop since April, 1929, and had built up a lucrative business. Her lease expired July 1, 1937, and had approximately ten months to run when the remodeling- referred to in the preceding statement commenced, and eight months tO' run when she commenced her suit.

The suit is for an injunction against closing the arcade both pending suit and perpetual on its termination, and for $2,000 damages. The complaint does not specify the particular damages for which recovery is sought, but they would be…