Commonwealth v. Maldonado
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree on the theories of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty, in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 1, for the killing of Mark Parilla.1 The defendant raises four issues on appeal. First, he argues that his right to a public trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was violated by what he characterizes as a closure of the court room arising from the judge’s order to require all spectators attending the trial to sign in and show identification. Second, he contends that the judge erred…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Commonwealth v. DayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McGheeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. DePinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Daniel P. Roberts v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Commonwealth v. RayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.