Legal Opinion

Ahmad v. Ennab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*638The plaintiffs were involved in an automobile accident in Israel while passengers in a rented car. They claim that Budget Rent A Car is liable under theories of apparent authority, implied agency and holding out to the public through advertising that it was the lessor of the subject vehicle.

Without giving notice to the parties of its intention to do so, the court treated the cross motion to dismiss as one for summary judgment and granted judgment in favor of Budget Rent A Car. This was error (see, CPLR 3211 [c]). However, the plaintiffs thereafter moved for reargument, at which time they had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. Del BelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Fogel v. Hertz International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Jacobson v. Princess Hotels International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. O'Hara v. Del BelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cavezza v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Rovinsky v. Hispanidad Holidays, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Bushey v. Restaurant Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Ramada, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API