Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ocasio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1994Published

1Dissent

Murphy, P. J. (dissenting).

I would reverse the judgment and dismiss the indictment. The suppression motion should have been granted.

The majority holds that pursuant to the common-law right to request information, police may detain the occupants of a motor vehicle for questioning while that vehicle is stopped for a red light, based on only an "articulable reason,” the lowest of the four levels enunciated in People v De Bour (40 NY2d 210, 213, 223). The majority thus equates the limited intrusion of Be Bour, asking a person on the sidewalk what he is doing in the neighborhood, with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API