Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Osborne

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion for an order directing the plaintiff to return certain moneys is granted to the extent of directing the plaintiff to return the sum of $1,780 to Gloria Rosner.

Admittedly, the Referee could not convey marketable title. Admittedly, a discontinuance of the partition action was obtained without a confirmation of the sale or the obtaining of a final judgment directing the conveyance in accordance with the sale. Therefore, the Referee is without the power to complete the transaction. The sum deposited with him, which is now in the possession of the plaintiff, should be returned to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parish v. ParishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API