Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vala v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1998No. 4-97-0190Published

1DissentJustice Cook

Under the rule announced today an insurer can process a claim without ever requesting a proof of loss from the insured, but still complain about the failure to submit a proof of loss once suit is filed. The majority holds the one-year period of limitations is not tolled during time charged to the insurer, the time while the insurer investigates the claim and considers what course of action it should take. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the decision of the trial court dismissing this complaint and remand for further proceedings.

This case involves a policy period of limitations, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Anthony Koclanakis, Doing Business as Pan-Olympian Travel Agency v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Tarzian v. West Bend Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Stoltz v. National Indemnity Co. of OmahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API