Legal Opinion

Mayo v. McCloskey & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 24395PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Defendants challenge the complaint by (1) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; (2) a motion to strike, and (3) a motion for a more definite statement. The complaint has two counts: (1) breach of contract to construct a house and (2) misrepresentation of the condition of the house at the time of settlement. The theories behind defendants’ motions are that neither count states a cause of action and the counts are improperly joined; damages are not itemized; fraud and deceit are alleged generally and not with particularity; the identity of the corporate agents…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis Lehrer and Eleanor B. Lehrer, His Wife v. McCloskey Homes, Inc. And McCloskey & Co. Of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Closed Circuit Corp. of America v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API