State Savings Bank v. Hosmer
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to quash a writ of garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
Washington Boright, Charles F. Lewis, and Peter Ozbourn.brought suit in assumpsit, in the Wayne •circuit court, against Barney J. Gagnier. The summons was issued November 19, 1892, and made returnable December 15 following. Plaintiffs on the same day also caused a writ of. garnishment to be issiied against the petitioner, the State Savings Bank. The affidavit for the writ was made by -the plaintiffs’ agent, .and sets out that he- has good reason to believe, etc., that certain other parties and the State Savings Bank, severally, have property, goods, chattels, credits, or effects in their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ball v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Clanton v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gay v. Laurens CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Cole v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Heugel v. TownsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- First State Bank v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Gold v. WeismanMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.