Legal Opinion

Anne Arundel County v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 21, 2015No. 29/14Published

1Opinion of the Court

Anne Arundel County, Maryland v. Steve Bell, No. 29, September Term, 2014 Zoning—Comprehensive Zoning—Legislative Action—Litigation—Standing Plaintiffs wishing to challenge in Maryland courts the legislative action adopting a comprehensive zoning ordinance are required to demonstrate taxpayer standing—a standing doctrine required for challenges to legislation. The doctrine of property owner standing (i.e., a proximity-driven standing doctrine) is not the appropriate basis upon which a judicial challenge to a comprehensive zoning legislative action may be maintained. Circuit Court for Anne…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API