Legal Opinion
Richards v. State's Attorneys Office
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided January 6, 1999No. 2:98-cv-00333PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
(Paper 2)
Ms. Richards (“Plaintiff’), acting pro se, filed this tort action against the State’s Attorneys Office (“Defendant”) for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Specifically, she asserts that Defendant’s failure to effectively and adequately prosecute a third person Plaintiff indicates had battered and sexually harassed her, and Defendant’s failure to record and believe her “story” of those events, has resulted in emotional damage, exposed her to additional harassment, and forced her to move her residency. She seeks $2,000 in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Honadle v. University of VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2000