Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Wolff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2013No. 20130267, 20130268, 20130269, 20130270, 20130271, 20130272, 20130273Published

1Opinion of the Court

DISBARMENT ORDERED.

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] The Court has before it a Consolidated Stipulation, Consent to Discipline, and Recommendations by the Hearing Panel, recommending James G. Wolff be disbarred effective October 1, 2010, the effective date of his previous disbarment. The Hearing Panel concluded Wolff violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(a), 1.15(c), 8.4(B), and 8.4(c); N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 1.2(A)(2) and 1.2(A)(3); N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-02(2); N.D.C.C. § 27-14-02(1); and N.D.C.C. § 27-14-02(7) in seven consolidated matters.

[¶ 2] Wolff was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on January 13,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Matter of Application for Disciplinary Action Against WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API