Legal Opinion

Ahmed v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 15, 2020No. 19-1349Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

3Jn tbe Wnittb §sitaten ~ourt of jfeberal ~Iaint.s No. 19-1349T (Filed: January I 4, 2020) ) IBRAHIM AHMED, ) Pro Se; Dismissal for Lack of Subject ) Matter Jurisdiction; Rule l 2(b )(I); Pro Se Plaintiff, ) Uniform Federal Lien Registration ) Act; Provisions of the Internal V. ) Revenue Service Restructuring and ) Reform Act; Tort Claims THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pending before the court is the United States' ("the government") motion to dismiss the above-captioned case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(l) of the Rules of the United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API