Legal Opinion

Corning Motor Company v. White

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

Appellant motor company made a conditional sale of a Ford automobile to one Ben Godfrey, retaining the title until paid for, and the purchaser took the car to the shop land garage of appellee for repairs, and, upon his-failure to pay the charges therefor, appellee retained possession of the car, claiming a lien thereon for repairs. The purchaser failed to pay for the car, and appellant did not know of its whereabouts until the 20th day of May, 1925, when áppellee notified him he had it in his possession, and claimed a lien for repairs and for storage thereon.

After demand made, appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weber Implement & Automobile Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Lowe Auto Co. v. WinklerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Gardner v. First National Bank of DeQueenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Shelton v. Little Rock Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terrell v. LoomisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Motor Credit Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Herringer v. Mercantile Bank of JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. Hayes-Lamb Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Paragould Motor Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API