State v. Ricker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant was charged with two counts of theft I, ORS 164.055, and one count of theft II. ORS 164.045. The three-year Statute of Limitations of ORS 131.125(5) had run. Nevertheless, the state argued that the limitation period was subject to ORS 131.125(6)(a), because the indictment alleged that defendant had breached a fiduciary duty that he owed the victims. Defendant filed a demurrer to the indictment, which the trial court sustained. The state appeals and we affirm.
ORS 131.125(6)(a) provides, in part:
“If the offense has as a material element either fraud or the breach of a fiduciary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monfore v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. NistlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013